Legal Opinion

Rota-Cone Oil Field Operating Co. v. Chamness

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 7, 1946No. 31566PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HURST, V.C.J.

The Workmen’s Compensation Law of this state provides that if a workman entitled to compensation thereunder is injured “by the negligence or wrong of another not in the same employ,” he may pursue his common law remedy against such person in the courts, 85 O. S. 1941 § 44. The principal issue involved in this case is whether employees of separate independent contractors under the same general contractor, working together to accomplish a common result, but performing the separate tasks for which they were hired, are persons in the “same employ” within the meaning of the above…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Parkhill Truck Co. v. WilsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  2. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. De VoreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  3. Dolese Bros. v. TollettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  4. Thompson v. KiesterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  5. Shell Petroleum Corporation v. PerrinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Mid-Continent Pipe Line Co. v. WilkersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948
  2. Jordon v. Champlin Refining Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948
  3. Houk v. Arrow Drilling Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1968
  4. Lambert v. Inryco, Inc.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1982
  5. O'BAUGH v. Drilling Well Control, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API