Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Bledsoe

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided October 26, 1984No. ACM 23926 (f rev)PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION UPON FURTHER REVIEW

HODGSON, Chief Judge:

The principal issues before us are the appellant’s mental condition and the procedure by which this evidence was presented to the members, together with the prosecution’s pretrial knowledge of statements made by the appellant during the sanity inquiry. We find no error to warrant setting aside the appellant’s conviction. However, to better understand the assigned errors a brief discussion of the facts and appellate history would be helpful.

I

The circumstances surrounding the offenses at bar are not complicated. The record disclosed that on 14…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States v. TaylorUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
  2. United States v. James Ray Terry, Gordon Lynn PeelerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
  3. United States v. ClarkU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1982
  4. United States v. ColcolUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
  5. United States v. LittlehalesU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1984

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. MartelU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1985
  2. United States v. BledsoeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
  3. United States v. SmithU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1990
  4. United States v. MorenoU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1985
  5. United States v. TurnerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API