United States v. Clark
U S Air Force Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION
HODGSON, Chief Judge:
A general court-martial, consisting of members, convicted the accused of committing an indecent act on a female under 16 *979years of age, a violation of Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 934.1 He was sentenced to a dishonorable discharge, three years confinement at hard labor, and forfeiture of all pay and allowances.
The issue before the court is whether a witness may give his opinion as to the truthfulness of an accused’s out-of-court statement. In this case, the witness, purporting to interpret the accused’s “body language” concluded that…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Zimberg v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1944
- United States of America Ex Rel. James Springle, Relator-Appellant v. Harold M. Follette, Warden, Greenhaven Prison, Stormville, N. Y.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
- State v. RideauSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1973
- State v. FredericksSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1966
- United States v. AdkinsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1955
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- United States v. CameronUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1985
- United States v. MansfieldU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1991
- United States v. WagnerU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1985
- United States v. BledsoeU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1984
- United States v. BrowderU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1985
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.