Legal Opinion

Flint v. Bronson

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 7, 1939No. 27368. Department OnePublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

This action was brought to foreclose a lien for labor and material furnished in the construction of a dwelling house. Aside from the plaintiff, there were a number of other lien claimants who were made parties defendant. The principal defendants were Robert E. Bronson and Marie Bronson, his wife, the owners of the property. A trial was to the court without a jury, and resulted in a decree sustaining a number of the liens and in a personal judgment, either against the contractor or against the owners of the property. From the decree, as entered, Bronson and wife appeal.

The facts, while…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Rieflin v. GraftonWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Petro Paint Manufacturing Co. v. TaylorWashington Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Lavanway v. CannonWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Seattle Lighting Fixture Co. v. Broadway Central Market, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1930
  5. American Plumbing & Steam Supply Co. v. AlavekiuWashington Supreme Court · 1929

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Stephenson v. Ketchikan Spruce Mills, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Standard Lumber Co. v. FieldsWashington Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Franklin v. FischerWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Olson v. ScholesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1977
  5. Barrett v. HampeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API