Legal Opinion

Franklin v. Fischer

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 29, 1949No. 30992PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.

This is an action to cancel a lease and recover possession of leased premises, and for rentals due under the lease, with a cross-complaint asking for damages against the lessors for their failure to keep the premises in repair.

The leased premises consist of a service station, restaurant, and tourist cabins. By article 3, the lessee was to pay, as “full rental for the premises during the effective term of this Lease”: a gallonage charge for the use of the “automotive equipment, pumps and like items of personal property”; thirty-five per cent of , the gross receipts from the tourist cabins, for…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ashmun v. NicholsOregon Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Standard Lumber Co. v. FieldsWashington Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Asheim v. FaheyOregon Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Garbrick v. FranzWashington Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Flint v. BronsonWashington Supreme Court · 1939

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Tiegs v. WattsWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Tiegs v. WattsWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Alexander & Alexander, Inc. v. WohlmanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1978
  4. Puget Sound Mutual Savings Bank v. LillionsWashington Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Tiegs v. Boise Cascade Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1996

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API