Legal Opinion
Wharton v. Mollinet
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 23, 1951No. Civ. 4310PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BARNARD, P. J.—
This is an action for a partition, as between the three owners, of a described 40 acres of land in Kern County.
The land formerly belonged to Neis P. Clausen. In the second, third and fourth paragraphs of his will he gave full title of this land to his three nieces, respectively, giving a one-half interest to one of them and a one-fourth interest to each of the other two. The fifth paragraph appointed one of the nieces as executrix. In the sixth paragraph he stated that if he was still in possession of this land at the time of his death “I hereby decree that my heirs do not sell…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Loring v. Town of KingsleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Goad v. MontgomeryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Murray v. GreenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
- Title Guarantee & Trust Co. v. GarrottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- Manning v. Bank of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Reagh v. KelleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Edgar v. HuntMontana Supreme Court · 1985
- Wogman v. Wells Fargo Bank & UnionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Budny v. BANK OF AMERICA, NAT. TRUST AND SAVINGS ASSN.California Court of Appeal · 1959
- Godoy v. LinznerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2024
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.