Legal Opinion

Budny v. BANK OF AMERICA, NAT. TRUST AND SAVINGS ASSN.

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 8, 1959No. Civ. 18263PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDraper, J.

Plaintiffs’ complaint seeks declaration of the invalidity of a testamentary trust, alleging that “administration was had and closed” upon the estate of the testator and quoting the challenged provisions of the trust from the will “and . . . the Decree of Final Distribution.” Demurrer to the complaint was sustained without leave to amend, and plaintiffs appeal from the ensuing judgment. The assertion that the trust is invalid is based solely upon its claimed violation of the rule against perpetuities and that against restraints upon alienation. (Cal. Const., art. XX, § 9; Civ. Code, §§ 715.1,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Loring v. Town of KingsleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Crew v. PrattCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Christal v. TresconyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Trepanier v. University of North DakotaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  5. Wogman v. Wells Fargo Bank & UnionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Edgar v. HuntMontana Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Estate of CooperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  3. Flournoy v. FoleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API