Legal Opinion
French v. War Contracts Price Adjustment Board
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 23, 1950No. 12449PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STEPHENS, Circuit Judge.
Feeling himself aggrieved, Bert French, a resident of San Pedro, California, within the Ninth Judicial Circuit, has attempted to have this court review a renegotiation decision of the Tax Court holding that he had enjoyed excess profits upon government supplies to the navy for the year 1943. His points are (1) that the service for which he was paid is not covered by the Renegotiation Act, and (2) that he realized no excessive profits. We quote the renegotiation statute in part in the margin. 1
The respondent Board has presented a “Motion to Dismiss Petition for Review”…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Lichter v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Aircraft & Diesel Equipment Corp. v. HirschSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- MacAuley v. Waterman Steamship Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Luckenbach Steamship Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- U. S. Electrical Motors, Inc. v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1946
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- United States v. California Eastern Line, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Richfield Oil Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1953
- Transducer Patents Company v. The Renegotiation BoardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
- United States v. Ring Const. Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1951
- Ebco Manufacturing Co. v. Secretary of CommerceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1955
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.