Legal Opinion
United States v. Ring Const. Corp.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided February 23, 1951No. Civ. A. No. 2287PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NORDBYE, Chief Judge.
This cause came before the Court on plaintiff’s motion to dismiss the counterclaim which defendant sets forth in its amended answer.
By this action plaintiff seeks to recover from defendant profits which were found by the Secretary of War to be excessive upon renegotiation of certain contracts entered into between plaintiff and defendant as part of the military building program at the commencement of World War II. Defendant has interposed a counterclaim which plaintiff now asks the Court to dismiss. The following facts are necessary for an understanding of the motion.
Shortl…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Crowell v. BensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Estep v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Stoll v. GottliebSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Old Colony Trust Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States v. PattersonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1953
- Dieseth v. CALDER MANUFACTURING COMPANYSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
- Ring Const. Corp. v. United States United States v. Ring Const. CorpCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1954
- Stearns v. SUGARBUSH VALLEY CORPORATIONSupreme Court of Vermont · 1972
- United States v. Ring Const. Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1953
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.