Legal Opinion
Richfield Oil Corp. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 21, 1953No. 13385PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
POPE, Circuit Judge.
Appellant Richfield, plaintiff below, brought this action assertedly under the Administrative Procedure Act, 1 in which it complains of a long series of acts by the Maritime Administration of the Department of Commerce, and by the United States Maritime Commission and the War Shipping Administration, agencies to whose functions the Maritime Administration has succeeded. For the sake of simplicity, we shall here speak of all three agencies as one, referring to it as the Maritime agency.
Richfield characterizes its action as one brought for the purpose of obtaining judicial…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Joint Anti-Fascist Refugee Committee v. McGrathSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Larson v. Domestic and Foreign Commerce Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Skelly Oil Co. v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Smither and Company, Inc. v. Franciska T. ColesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1957
- John P. King v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
- Armstrong & Armstrong, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 1973
- Richfield Oil Corporation, a Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
- Standard Oil Company Of California v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.