Legal Opinion

Atterbury v. Wells

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 5, 1994No. 92CV1575CC; CA A78184PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, P. J.

Plaintiff appeals a judgment for defendant, based on the trial court’s holding that defendant was not adequately-served with summons and complaint. We affirm.

On July 5, 1990, plaintiff was injured in an automobile accident. On June 30,1992, plaintiff filed a complaint alleging that her injuries were the result of defendant’s negligence. The facts relating to service of summons are undisputed. On June 30,1992, plaintiffs attorney sent a copy of the complaint to defendant’s insurance carrier by regular mail. On that same date, plaintiffs attorney requested the Curry County Sheriff to serve…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Baker v. FoyOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Duber v. ZeitlerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  3. Edwards v. EdwardsOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Campos v. ChisholmCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Davis Wright Tremaine, LLP v. MenkenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  2. Boyd v. BoydCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  3. Levens v. KoserCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  4. Paschall v. CrispCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  5. Option One Mortgage Corp. v. WallCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API