Atterbury v. Wells
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtRossman, P. J.
Plaintiff appeals a judgment for defendant, based on the trial court’s holding that defendant was not adequately-served with summons and complaint. We affirm.
On July 5, 1990, plaintiff was injured in an automobile accident. On June 30,1992, plaintiff filed a complaint alleging that her injuries were the result of defendant’s negligence. The facts relating to service of summons are undisputed. On June 30,1992, plaintiffs attorney sent a copy of the complaint to defendant’s insurance carrier by regular mail. On that same date, plaintiffs attorney requested the Curry County Sheriff to serve…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Baker v. FoyOregon Supreme Court · 1990
- Duber v. ZeitlerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
- Edwards v. EdwardsOregon Supreme Court · 1990
- Campos v. ChisholmCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
3Cited by8 opinions
- Davis Wright Tremaine, LLP v. MenkenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
- Boyd v. BoydCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
- Levens v. KoserCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
- Paschall v. CrispCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
- Option One Mortgage Corp. v. WallCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.