Legal Opinion

Duber v. Zeitler

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 17, 1993No. 90CV3679; CA A71816PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, P.J.

This is a personal injury action arising out of a motor vehicle accident. Plaintiff seeks to recover damages that she alleges she sustained as a result of defendant’s negligence. The trial court granted summary judgment to defendant on the ground that he had not been adequately served. Plaintiff appeals. Because we conclude that service was reasonably calculated to give notice to defendant, ORCP 7D(1), we reverse and remand.

The record on summary judgment shows that defendant and plaintiff were involved in an automobile accident on December 6, 1988. On December 6, 1990, within the time…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Baker v. FoyOregon Supreme Court · 1990

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Hoeck v. Schwabe, Williamson & WyattCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  2. Murphy v. PriceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  3. Boyd v. BoydCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  4. Levens v. KoserCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  5. Paschall v. CrispCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API