Paschall v. Crisp
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the Court
*620LANDAU, J.
Plaintiff appeals a summary judgment entered in favor of defendant on the ground that plaintiff failed to complete service within the statute of limitations. We affirm.
The facts are undisputed. On November 3, 1990, defendant1 was driving a car registered in his brother’s name when he rear-ended plaintiff. Defendant’s brother was a passenger. When an investigating police officer arrived at the scene of the accident, defendant reported his current address as 8150 S.W. Barnes Road, Portland. The officer recorded that address in the police report.
On November 2, 1992, plaintiff filed a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Baker v. FoyOregon Supreme Court · 1990
- Duber v. ZeitlerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
- Murphy v. PriceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
- Luyet v. EhrnfeltCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- McCall v. KulongoskiOregon Supreme Court · 2005
- Yen Linh Thi Pham v. FaberCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
- Mitchem v. RiceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
- Carlson v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
- Gish v. YoungbloodCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.