Legal Opinion

Edwards v. Edwards

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 26, 1990No. TC 16-85-06382; CA A48610; SC S36265PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFadeley, J.

Plaintiff relies on service by certified mail, return receipt requested, addressed to an individual defendant’s Nevada post office box, to constitute sufficient service of summons and complaint in an Oregon action. That mail was not delivered to defendant but was, instead, returned to plaintiff by the postal authorities rubber-stamped “UNCLAIMED.” The Court of Appeals affirmed a circuit court judgment dismissing the complaint because of insufficient service. Edwards v. Edwards, 96 Or App 623, 773 P2d 809 (1989). We affirm.

Plaintiff filed her complaint pro se in August of 1985. Plaintiffs…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Baker v. FoyOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Lake Oswego Review, Inc. v. SteinkampOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Thoenes v. TatroOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Matter of Marriage of EdwardsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Davis Wright Tremaine, LLP v. MenkenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  2. Murphy v. PriceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  3. Levens v. KoserCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  4. Starr v. GeorgeAlaska Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Campos v. ChisholmCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API