State v. Owczarzak
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the Court
*502WARREN, J.
Defendant appeals his conviction for public indecency, ORS 163.465, after a trial to the court on stipulated facts. We reverse.
Defendant assigns as error the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence obtained as a result of the same warrantless police surveillance that we discussed in State v. Casconi, 94 Or App 457, 766 P2d 397 (1988). Acting on the request of the highway department to investigate sexual activity in a public restroom on an interstate highway, the police installed two videotape cameras in “peepholes.” The cameras were placed so that the police could…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. KennedyOregon Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. CampbellOregon Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. TannerOregon Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. HoltOregon Supreme Court · 1981
- State v. CasconiCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. CasconiCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
- State v. LimberhandIdaho Court of Appeals · 1990
- State v. WackerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
- State v. HolidayCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
- State v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.