Legal Opinion

State v. Owczarzak

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 21, 1988No. 87-11706; CA A46859PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*502WARREN, J.

Defendant appeals his conviction for public indecency, ORS 163.465, after a trial to the court on stipulated facts. We reverse.

Defendant assigns as error the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence obtained as a result of the same warrantless police surveillance that we discussed in State v. Casconi, 94 Or App 457, 766 P2d 397 (1988). Acting on the request of the highway department to investigate sexual activity in a public restroom on an interstate highway, the police installed two videotape cameras in “peepholes.” The cameras were placed so that the police could…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. KennedyOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  2. State v. CampbellOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  3. State v. TannerOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  4. State v. HoltOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  5. State v. CasconiCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. CasconiCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  2. State v. LimberhandIdaho Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. State v. WackerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  4. State v. HolidayCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  5. State v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API