Legal Opinion

State v. Holiday

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 25, 2013No. 101051182; A147796PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchuman, P. J.

Defendant appeals his conviction for possession of cocaine, ORS 475.884, assigning error to the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress. Believing that defendant was in violation of a term of his probation, police unlocked and opened the door to the public restroom that defendant was occupying. The state argued below that entry into the restroom was lawful because the officer who unlocked the door had reason to believe that defendant was trying to evade him and that, once defendant came out of the restroom, cocaine residue on a “crack pipe” was in plain view. On appeal, the state…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Ball v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Outdoor Media Dimensions Inc. v. StateOregon Supreme Court · 2001
  3. State v. HallOregon Supreme Court · 2005
  4. State v. CampbellOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  5. State v. MillerOregon Supreme Court · 1985

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. CherryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  2. State v. HeaterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  3. State v. TeglandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  4. State v. TaplinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API