Legal Opinion

State v. Casconi

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 21, 1988No. 87-11632; CA A47332PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJoseph, C. J.

Defendant appeals his conviction for public indecency. ORS 163.465. He contends that warrantless police surveillance of a public restroom violated his rights under Article I, section 9, of the Oregon constitution, and the Fourth Amendment and that the evidence gained should be suppressed. The trial court refused to suppress. We reverse.

The Oregon State police conducted clandestine surveillance of a restroom in a freeway rest area. A hidden camera was directed at two doorless toilet stalls that were separated by a metal partition. The camera was located at a hole in an outside concrete wall.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. KennedyOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  2. State v. CampbellOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Sterling v. CuppOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  4. State v. LouisOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  5. State v. HoltOregon Supreme Court · 1981

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. BarnumCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  2. State v. LimberhandIdaho Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. State v. OwczarzakCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  4. State v. BoyntonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997
  5. Ward v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API