State v. Wacker
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the Court
*485BUTTLER, P. J.
The state seeks reversal of an order granting defendant’s motion to suppress evidence discovered as a result of police observation of defendant with a “starlight scope”1 and camcorder. The sole issue is whether the enhanced observations made by using the scope constituted a search. We agree with the trial court that it did and affirm.
With the consent of the Aloha Tavern owner, three officers stationed themselves in a darkened, second floor office above the front end of the tavern parking lot. The officers used the scope and a video camcorder to watch the lot for drug activity.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- State v. CampbellOregon Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. LouisOregon Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. AinsworthOregon Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. SlowikowskiOregon Supreme Court · 1988
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. WackerOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. LawrenceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
- State v. GonzalezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
- State v. GonzalezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
- State v. WackerOregon Supreme Court · 1993
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.