Legal Opinion

State v. Wacker

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 26, 1992No. C8904498CR; CA A62171PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*485BUTTLER, P. J.

The state seeks reversal of an order granting defendant’s motion to suppress evidence discovered as a result of police observation of defendant with a “starlight scope”1 and camcorder. The sole issue is whether the enhanced observations made by using the scope constituted a search. We agree with the trial court that it did and affirm.

With the consent of the Aloha Tavern owner, three officers stationed themselves in a darkened, second floor office above the front end of the tavern parking lot. The officers used the scope and a video camcorder to watch the lot for drug activity.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. State v. CampbellOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  3. State v. LouisOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  4. State v. AinsworthOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  5. State v. SlowikowskiOregon Supreme Court · 1988

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. WackerOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. LawrenceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  3. State v. GonzalezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  4. State v. GonzalezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  5. State v. WackerOregon Supreme Court · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API