Legal Opinion

State v. Wilson

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 2, 2018No. A162122PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtShorr, J.

*582Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for public indecency, ORS 163.465. Before trial, defendant moved to suppress the observations of two police officers who, from several feet away, glanced under a partition of a public restroom stall and saw defendant lying on the floor masturbating. Defendant argued that the officers conducted a warrantless search that violated his right to privacy under Article I, section 9, of the Oregon Constitution. The trial court denied defendant's motion after finding that there was no search. On appeal, defendant assigns error to that ruling. For the reasons…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. EhlyOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. CampbellOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Sterling v. CuppOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  4. State v. LouisOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  5. State v. HoltOregon Supreme Court · 1981

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. WardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API