Legal Opinion

Donovan v. Dixon

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 27, 1959No. 37,954PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Matson, Justice.

Alternative writ of mandamus to compel the trial court to grant a change of venue from Todd County to Hennepin County.

The specific issue to be considered is whether, in a transitory action involving several defendants residing in different counties, a majority of such defendants, under M. S. A. 542.10, have the right to obtain a change of venue upon demand to a county of their own selection not only in actions commenced in an improper county, but also in actions commenced in a proper county within the meaning of § 542.09 as amended by L. 1955, c. 614.

Plaintiff commenced an…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Chadbourne v. ReedSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
  2. Dworsky v. HerbstSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
  3. Gulbrandson v. Empire Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Yellow Manufacturing Acceptance Corp. v. ZimmermanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
  2. Anderson v. Farmers Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  3. Brudzinski v. DeKALB AGRICULTURAL ASSOCIATIONSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
  4. Agricultural Insurance v. Midwest Technical Development Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
  5. First National Bank in Moorhead v. F. M. Distributors, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1963

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API