Legal Opinion

Urban v. Zeigler

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 1, 1994No. 2-93-0776PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McLAREN

The plaintiff, Scott Urban, filed a complaint against the defendant, William W. Zeigler, seeking damages for personal injuries sustained in an automobile collision. A jury awarded the plaintiff $9,800 for medical expenses. No damages were awarded for aggravation of a preexisting condition, disability and disfigurement, pain and suffering, or lost wages. On appeal, the plaintiff seeks a new trial on the issue of damages on the basis that the jury’s verdict was irreconcilably inconsistent and against the manifest weight of the evidence. For the following reasons, we affirm in part, reverse in…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hinnen v. BurnettAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986
  2. Rice v. Merchants National BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  3. Healy v. Bearco Management, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  4. Elliott v. KochAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990
  5. Guy v. SteurerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Snover v. McGrawIllinois Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Majcher v. Laurel Motors, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1997
  3. Tedeschi v. Burlington Northern RailroadAppellate Court of Illinois · 1996
  4. Knight v. LordAppellate Court of Illinois · 1995
  5. Loncar v. GrayAlaska Supreme Court · 2001

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API