Legal Opinion
Majcher v. Laurel Motors, Inc.
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided April 28, 1997No. 2—96—0656, 2—96—0664 consPublishedCited by 47 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Inglis
The facts of this case arose when plaintiff, Linda Majcher, purchased a car with a tampered odometer from defendant Laurel Motors, Inc. (Laurel). Plaintiff subsequently sued Laurel as well as the previous owners, defendants Robert and Diana Danger (Langers), and the financing institution, defendant Beverly Bank (Bank). Following a jury trial at which Laurel was found liable to plaintiff for damages of $7,754.48 and attorney fees and costs of $44,807.41, and the Langers were found liable to plaintiff for damages of $12,000 and attorney fees and costs of $32,876.41, Laurel and the Langers…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Committee for Educational Rights v. EdgarIllinois Supreme Court · 1996
- Gerill Corp. v. Jack L. Hargrove Builders, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1989
- Totz v. Continental Du Page AcuraAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992
- Pagano v. Occidental Chemical Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1994
- Puskar v. HughesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1989
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Robinson v. Toyota Motor Credit Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 2002
- Krautsack v. AndersonIllinois Supreme Court · 2006
- Door Systems, Inc., Cross-Appellee v. Pro-Line Door Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- Reed v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1998
- Allen v. Woodfield Chevrolet, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 2003
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.