Loncar v. Gray

OPINION

FABE, Chief Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Kala Loncear contends that evidentiary de-cigions in her personal injury trial were prejudicial to her case and resulted in an inadequate jury award. She argues that the superior court erred by admitting evidence of her prior medical history, by precluding evidence of her government medical benefits, by restricting cross-examination of her ex-husband, and by admitting post-accident medical records without foundational testimony from a physician. She also maintains that the superior court erred in denying her motion for a new trial, Because we conclude…