Legal Opinion

Willingham v. States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided June 6, 1996No. 94-519CPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HORN, Judge.

This case comes before the court on the defendant’s motion to dismiss and the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment. Defendant’s motion to dismiss was filed pursuant to Rule 12(b) of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (RCFC), and the cross-motions for summary judgment were filed pursuant to RCFC 56.1.

The pro se plaintiff, N. Jerome Willing-ham,1 initially filed this action for compensatory and injunctive relief, pursuant to 37 U.S.C. § 101 et seq. (1988), claiming that the defendant, the United States, acting through the Department of the Navy,…

2Cases cited62 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Spehr v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
  2. Williams v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
  3. Williams v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021
  4. Williams v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API