Legal Opinion

Chisholm v. Clitherall

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 15, 1867PublishedCited by 10 opinions

This is an appeal taken by tbe plaintiff, from an order of tbe district court for Scott county, setting aside and vacating tbe decree which had been entered in tbe action. The case is fully stated in tbe opinion of tbe court.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court

McMillan, J.

This is an appeal by tbe plaintiff, Chisholm, from an order setting aside tbe judgment. This action was brought by Chisholm, to foreclose a mortgage given by tbe defendant Clitherall, to one Gibbs, and assigned by Mm to tbe plaintiff. When tbe action was commenced does not definitely appear, but we gather from tbe affidavits in tbe paper book, that it was some time between 1861, and tbe 9th of October, 1863. On tbe 30th of April, 1866, tbe following stipulation was entered into between tbe parties of *377record, the defendant Clitherall not having appeared in the action:…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Whitacre v. CulverSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1864

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Amaral v. Saint Cloud HospitalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
  2. Crary v. KurtzSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
  3. Stevens v. Minneapolis Fire Department Relief Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
  4. Annis v. AnnisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
  5. Rodgers v. PittU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nevada · 1899

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API