Legal Opinion

Crary v. Kurtz

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided January 13, 1906PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Appeal from Marshall District Court.— Hon. Obed Caswell, Judge. Action to set aside a conveyance as fraudulent. Decreed as prayed. Tbe defendant Teresa Kurtz appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtLadd, J.

*1071 Parties: substitution: pleadings. *106Suit was begun by Obarles A. Buckwalk and F. S. Widl, creditors of Jospeb Kurtz, on August 20, *1071903, to enforce contribution by the latter as co-surety with them on certain promissory notes of the Kurtz Wagon Company which they had paid. Besides judgment for Kurtz’s pro rata share, plaintiffs prayed that a certain conveyance of about two hundred and eight acres of land, executed August 11, 1902, by Kurtz to his wife Teresa, be set aside and the judgment be enforced against the same. The defendants filed separate answers October 20, 1903, and on January…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Kain v. . LarkinNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
  2. Mueller v. BrussWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
  3. In re DuckerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1905
  4. In re Pekin Plow Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1901
  5. Chesapeake Shoe Co. v. SeldnerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1903

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Finch v. McClellanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1921
  2. Driscoll v. PenrodIndiana Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Ford v. OttSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917
  4. Jones v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1920
  5. Citizens Bank & Trust Co. v. McEuenCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1939

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API