Rodgers v. Pitt
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nevada
On Demurrer to Petition for Injunction.
1Opinion of the Court
HAWLEY, District Judge.
The questions presented for - decision herein arise upon the presentation of a petition on behalf of the complainant for a writ of injunction against the defendants, their attorneys and agents, enjoining them from prosecuting or conducting any further proceedings in a certain suit now pending in the district court of Humboldt county, Nev., entitled “J. H. Thies, P. N. Marker, and H. C. Marker, Plaintiffs, vs. W. C. Pitt, J. T. Hauskins, and L. L. *669Downs, Defendants.” The material facts presented in the petition may be briefly stated, in (heir chronological order, as…
2Cases cited105 opinions
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Taylor v. TaintorSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
- Cooper v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
- Covell v. HeymanSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Peck v. JennessSupreme Court of the United States · 1849
100 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Ohio Steel Foundry Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1930
- United States v. EisenbeisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1901
- Bunker Hill & Sullivan Mining & Concentrating Co. v. Shoshone Min. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1901
- Pitt v. RodgersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1900
- Miller & Lux v. RickeyU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nevada · 1906
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.