Rauscher v. Halstead
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtSwanson, J.
Robert A. Rauscher appeals from a judgment which apportioned the damages awarded to him for the illegal felling of trees on his property by the defendant Kenneth Halstead.
Rauscher owned an undeveloped lot located in Seattle upon which at least 32 trees were growing. Halstead resided on land immediately behind and above the Rauscher property. Some time in the latter part of April of 1973, Halstead cut two trees which were growing on the Rauscher property. The record reveals that Halstead assumed the trees were located on property owned by the city. However, the trial court specifically found…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Summers v. TiceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Maddux v. DonaldsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1961
- Alexander v. HammarbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- Litts v. Pierce CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1971
- Fugere v. PierceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1971
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Phennah v. WhalenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1980
- Elliott v. BarnesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1982
- Brown v. Spokane County Fire Protection District No. 1Court of Appeals of Washington · 1978
- Foster v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1987
- Poe v. SheeleyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1978
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.