Legal Opinion

Maddux v. Donaldson

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 28, 1961No. Docket 44-46, Calendar 48,474-48,476PublishedCited by 92 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*427Smith, J.

Once again1 we consider the problem of damages when the car in which plaintiffs are riding is struck first by one automobile and then,, almost simultaneously, by another.

The plaintiffs are Fred Maddux, his wife, and infant daughter. They were driving in an easterly direction on US-112, near Clinton, Michigan, in a Ford pickup. It had been raining and the pavement was wet. Paul Bryie was following them, both cars traveling at speeds between 35 and 40 miles per hour.. As the cars approached a bend in the road, Mr. Maddux observed a car some 1,500 feet away, skidding towards him,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Landers v. East Texas Salt Water Disposal Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Socony Vacuum Oil Co. v. MarvinMichigan Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Cuddy v. HornMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Meier v. HoltMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Hill v. PeresCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934

3Cited by92 opinions

  1. In Re "Agent Orange" Product Liability LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1984
  2. Abel v. Eli Lilly & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Azure Ex Rel. Marchington v. City of BillingsMontana Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Cox v. SpanglerWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Cox v. SpanglerWashington Supreme Court · 2000

87 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API