Lynn v. Wheeler
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtHiggiNS, J.
In this ease the plaintiff alleged the defendants in five particulars failed to exercise reasonable care for hiis safety while he was attending their automobile races as a paying customer; and thiat their negligence as 'Charged proximately caused 'his injury and damage. Proof substantially ais alleged in at least one of the particulars iis essential to recovery. Messick v. Turnage, 240 N.C. 625, 83 S.E. 2d 654; Smith v. Barnes, 236 N.C. 176, 72 S.E. 2d 216. The motion to nonsuit challenged the sufficiency of the evidence to go. to- the jury on my of the particulars alleged. To. support a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Chambers Ex Rel. Chambers v. AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- Maddox v. BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- Messick v. TurnageSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- Williams v. StricklandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- Smith v. BarnesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Aaser v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- Bertotti v. Charlotte Motor Speedway, Inc.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1995
- Pierce v. MurnickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965