Legal Opinion

Smith v. Barnes

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 17, 1952No. 20PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeNNY, J.

The plaintiff insists that if bis evidence is considered'in tbe light most favorable to him, as it should be on a motion for judgment as of nonsuit, such evidence is sufficient to warrant its submission to a jury. Chambers v. Allen, 233 N.C. 195, 63 S.E. 2d 212; Carson v. Doggett, 231 N.C. 629, 58 S.E. 2d 609; Thomas v. Motor Lines, 230 N.C. 122, 52 S.E. 2d 377; Bundy v. Powell, 229 N.C. 707, 51 S.E. 2d 307.

"We cannot concur in this view in light of the pleadings and the evidence disclosed by the record.

There is no allegation in the complaint to indicate, or from which it may be inferred,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Bundy v. . PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  2. Croom v. . Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  3. Thomas v. Motor LinesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  4. Croom v. Goldsboro Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  5. Carson v. DoggettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Maxwell v. Michael P. Doyle, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
  2. McCraw v. LlewellynSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  3. Messick v. TurnageSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  4. Atkinson v. WilkersonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
  5. Lynn v. WheelerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API