Legal Opinion

Pierce v. Murnick

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 24, 1965No. 612PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

The purchaser of a ticket of admission to a wrestling match is an invitee of the promoter. The promoter is not an insurer of his safety while upon the premises, but is under the duty to use reasonable care to prevent injury to him through a defect in the condition of the premises or by the action of the contestants in the course of the match. See: Aaser v. City of Charlotte, ante, p. 494; Dockery v. Shows, 264 N.C. 406, 142 S.E. 2d 29; Lynn v. Wheeler, 260 N.C. 658, 133 S.E. 2d 514; Williams v. Strickland, 251 N.C. 767, 112 S.E. 2d 533; Hahn v. Perkins, 228 N.C. 727, 46 S.E. 2d 854; Anderson…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Reidsville Amusement Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  2. Hahn v. . PerkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  3. Dockery Ex Rel. Pullen v. World of Mirth Shows, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  4. Williams v. StricklandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  5. Lynn v. WheelerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hedrick Ex Rel. Hedrick v. TigniereSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  2. Holland v. MalpassSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  3. C. & M. PROMOTIONS v. RylandSupreme Court of Virginia · 1967
  4. Moseley v. HendricksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2025
  5. Moseley v. HendricksCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API