Legal Opinion
Iconco v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided August 1, 1984No. 617-83CPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LYDON, Judge:
This government contract case involves review, under standards of the Wunderlich Act 41 U.S.C. §§ 321-322 (1976), of a decision by the Postal Service Board of Contract Appeals (Board) denying plaintiff’s claims for (1) additional compensation for removal of 231 cubic yards of excavation, and (2) additional compensation because of the Postal Service’s refusal to permit plaintiff to use certain excavated soil for back-filling and its refusal to pay plaintiff for its replacement with structural fill. On review, it is concluded that the Board’s decision is correct in fact and…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Beacon Construction Co. of Massachusetts v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
- Koppers Company, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
- Joseph Sternberger, Trustee in Bankruptcy for Spenco, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
- Arundel Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1975
- Hegeman-Harris & Company, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1971
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Cherry Hill Sand & Gravel Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1985
- Stegall v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1990
- Tatelbaum ex rel. Creditors of A. Hoen & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1986
- Straga v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1985
- Maitland Bros. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1990
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.