Legal Opinion
Hegeman-Harris & Company, Inc. v. The United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided April 16, 1971No. 341-67PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NICHOLS, Judge.
This case is before us on cross motions for summary judgment. We conclude that the plaintiff is entitled to recover on part of the claim, in an amount to be determined in a Rule 131(c) proceeding.
Plaintiff was the successful bidder on a fixed-price contract for the construction of a United States courthouse and Federal office building in Albuquerque, New Mexico. The contract, designated by the General Services Administration (GSA) as No. GS-08B-3566, was awarded on February 8, 1963, and had a fixed-price of $6,368,000. Included in its provisions was the following:
1-9 FEDERAL,…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- United States v. Utah Construction & Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Hol-Gar Manufacturing Corp. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
- Swift & Co. v. Hocking Valley Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Peter Kiewit Sons' Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1947
- J. L. Simmons Company, Inc., a Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1962
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Erickson Air Crane Company of Washington, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- P.J. Maffei Building Wrecking Corporation v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Design & Production, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1990
- The Firestone Tire & Rubber Company v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1971
- Gresham & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1972
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.