Legal Opinion
Straga v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided May 1, 1985No. 173-84CPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LYDON, Judge:
In this direct access construction contract case, brought under the Contract Disputes Act (41 U.S.C. § 609(a)(1)) (CDA), plaintiff seeks to recover additional compensation on alternative theories of constructive change or contract reformation based on plaintiff's unilateral mistake. Defendant has moved to dismiss plaintiff’s action on the ground that the court lacks jurisdiction thereof under the CDA because plaintiff never submitted a claim within the purview of the CDA to the contracting officer.. In the alternative, defendant has cross-moved for summary judgment on the…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- United States, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. John C. Grimberg Co., Inc. And W.M. Schlosser Co., Inc., Appellees/cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Swift & Co. v. Hocking Valley Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
- WPC Enterprises, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
- Paragon Energy Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
- Beacon Construction Co. of Massachusetts v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Mega Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
- American Pacific Roofing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1990
- Cherry Hill Sand & Gravel Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1985
- Metric Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1988
- Gardner Machinery Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1988
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.