Legal Opinion

Keller Co. v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided January 18, 1926No. 2561PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBland, Judge

Paragraphs 1467 and 1651 of the Tariff Act of 1922 read as follows:

Par. 1467. — Waste, not specially provided for, 10 per centum ad valorem.

Par. 1651. — Rag pulp; paper stock, crude, of every description, including all grasses, fibers, rags, waste, including jute, hemp and flax waste, shavings, clippings, old paper, rope ends, waste rope, and waste bagging, and all other waste not specially provided for, including old gunny cloth, and old gunny bags, used chiefly for paper making, and no longer suitable for bags.

The collector assessed for duty, at 10 per centum ad valorem, under paragraph…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Magone v. WiedererSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. Vandiver v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  3. United States v. HempsteadCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
  4. United States v. MacNaughtonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
  5. Meyer v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Frazer v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961
  2. California Oil Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1952
  3. Geo. S. Bush & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1964
  4. Sandoz Chemical Works, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1955
  5. Clayton Chemical & Packaging Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API