Legal Opinion

Geo. S. Bush & Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided May 13, 1964No. 68544; protests 60/23985 and 61/2464 (Portland, Oreg.)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bao, Judge:

The two protests here involved, which have been consolidated for purposes of trial, relate to importations of cold-rolled steel strips of stated specifications, which were assessed with duty at the rate of 10% per centum ad valorem, within the provisions of paragraph 313 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the Sixth Protocol of Supplementary Concessions to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, 91 Treas. Dec. 150, T.D. 54108, for—

Bands and strips of iron or steel, whether in long or short lengths, not specially provided for.

It is the contention of the plaintiffs that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Burgess Battery Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1947
  2. Keller Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  3. Pheoll Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958
  4. Standard International Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1954

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Alaska Steel Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
  2. P. W. Bellingall, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API