Sandoz Chemical Works, Inc. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Oliveb, Chief Judge:
This case relates to merchandise described on the invoice as “homatropine hydrobromide” classified under paragraph 28 (a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, which, so far as pertinent, reads as follows:
Pae. 28. Coal-tar products:(a) * * * acetanilide suitable for medicinal use, acetphenetidine, acetyl-salicylic acid, antipyrine, benzaldehyde suitable for medicinal use, benzoic acid suitable for medicinal use, beta-naphthol suitable for medicinal use, guaiacol and its derivatives, phenolphthalein, resorcinol suitable for medicinal use, salicylic acid and its salts suitable for…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. BokerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
- Mid-Northern Oil Co. v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Klipstein v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1910
- United States v. HempsteadCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
- Monticelli Bros. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1917
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Sandoz Chemical Works, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961