Legal Opinion

Love v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 5, 1990No. 87-3832PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

915 F.2d 1242

Clinton W. LOVE, Sr., and Rose Mary Love, husband and wife,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

UNITED STATES of America, United States Department of

Agriculture, Farmers Home Administration, Philip A. Young,

Claude Hargrove, Arthur E. Lund, Theodore Hebnes, Roger

Meredith, Rodger Vanvalkenburg, Dale Gilbert, Jim Walker,

Stanley Faught, and Gilbert L. Anderson, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 87-3832.

United States Court of Appeals,

Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted Feb. 4, 1988.

Decided April 6, 1989.

Amended Opinion Oct. 5, 1990.

Robert M. Kampfer, Gene A. Picotte, P.C., Clancy, Mont., for…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Carlson v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. United States v. S.A. Empresa De Viacao Aerea Rio GrandenseSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Home Building & Loan Assn. v. BlaisdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1934

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Jordan v. StateSupreme Court of Vermont · 1997
  2. Hatleberg v. Norwest Bank WisconsinWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Hawai'i Laborers' Trust Funds v. Maui Prince HotelHawaii Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Hussey v. SayHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2014
  5. Carrigan v. Alverson Taylor Mortensen & SandersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API