Legal Opinion

Carrigan v. Alverson Taylor Mortensen & Sanders

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 18, 2008No. 08-15754Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

Appellant Debra Carrigan appeals the district court’s judgment dismissing her case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. This court reviews the district court’s order de novo, and we affirm. See Love v. United States, 915 F.2d 1242 (9th Cir. 1990); Gibson v. United States, 781 F.2d 1334,1337 (9th Cir.1986).

Our review of the record and of appellant’s response to this court’s order to show cause indicates that the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam)…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. James Lynn HootonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  2. Gibson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  3. Love v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API