Legal Opinion
In Re the Appeal of Wenger
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided August 24, 1993No. C6-93-231PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WILLIAM J. FLEMING, Judge. *
The Department of Jobs and Training, Division of Rehabilitation Services (DRS), determined that relator Scott Wenger was eligible for rehabilitation services. The DRS and Wenger jointly developed a vocational goal which Wenger subsequently sought to amend. The DRS refused the requested amendment, concluding that Wenger’s new goal would not likely lead to employment. Following a hearing, an administrative law judge affirmed the DRS’ decision. The Assistant Commissioner of Jobs and Training adopted the AU’s decision, and Wenger sought review by certio-rari. We…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Buchanan v. IvesDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1991
- In Re the Appeal of JongquistCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
- McDonald v. WhippsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
- Marriage of Stevens v. StevensCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re the Adoption of L.O.F.Supreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2015
- Hedgepeth v. North Carolina Division of Services for the BlindCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
- Warner v. Thomas, No. Cv 98 0492631s (Jun. 22, 1999)Connecticut Superior Court · 1999