Hedgepeth v. North Carolina Division of Services for the Blind
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
TIMMONS-GOODSON, Judge.
Mary Hedgepeth (“petitioner”) appeals an order by the Superior Court affirming the decision of the Division of Services for the Blind (“respondent”) to deny petitioner additional benefits under the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (the “Rehabilitation Act” or “Act”), 29 U.S.C. § 701, et seq. (1994). For the reasons stated herein, we reverse the trial court’s order and remand the matter for entry of a new order in accordance with this opinion.
Under the Rehabilitation Act, the federal government administers grants to states for the provision of services “to empower individuals…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Amanini v. N.C. Department of Human ResourcesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
- ACT-UP Triangle v. Commission for Health ServicesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1997
- In re the Appeal by McCraryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
- Gregory C. Mallett v. Wisconsin Division of Vocational Rehabilitation and Judy R. Norman-NunneryCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- Brooks v. McWhirter Grading Co., Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Aubin v. SusiCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
- Capital Outdoor, Inc. v. Guilford County Board of AdjustmentCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
- Department of Transportation v. BlueCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
- Kor Xiong v. MarksCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
- Shackleford-Moten v. Lenoir County Dept. of Social ServicesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.