Legal Opinion
In Re the Appeal of Jongquist
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided September 25, 1990No. C3-90-737PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KLAPHAKE, Judge.
Relator Donald Jongquist seeks review of a decision by respondent, the Minnesota Department of Jobs and Training, Division of Rehabilitation Services (DRS). The DRS determined that Jongquist was required to obtain a student loan to pay for a portion of his rehabilitative training costs authorized by the DRS. We conclude the DRS erred by applying a rule not properly promulgated under the Administrative Procedure Act and, accordingly, we reverse and remand to the DRS for payment of the disputed costs.
FACTS
The Rehabilitation Act of 1973 allows a state to receive financial…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Matter of Hibbing Taconite Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
- Monk & Excelsior, Inc. v. Minnesota State Board of HealthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- Swenson v. State, Department of Public WelfareSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
3Cited by4 opinions
- Dullard v. Minnesota Dept. of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
- In Re the Appeal of WengerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
- Evenson v. Minnesota Department of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
- United States Steel Corporation, Relator v. Minnesota Pollution Control AgencyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015