Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re Casperson

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 31, 1945No. Crim. 1904PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeek, J.

Two misdemeanor proceedings are involved in this controversy. In the first, petitioner L. 0. Casperson was charged with the violation of section 1103 of the Agricultural Code in that he shipped into Sacramento county inedible eggs, while in the second action both L. O. and E. G. Casperson were charged jointly in two counts under said section. First, with shipping inedible eggs into Sacramento County, and second, with shipping mislabeled eggs into said county. The actions were consolidated for the purpose of trial, and at the conclusion thereof the petitioners were found guilty as alleged in…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Penziner v. West American Finance Co.California Supreme Court · 1937
  2. People v. . KiblerNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
  3. Boyd v. HuntingtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Mack v. JastroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  5. People v. SchwartzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. People v. KingCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  2. In Re MarleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  3. State Ex Rel. City of Mansfield v. CrainMissouri Court of Appeals · 1957
  4. Mantzoros v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  5. People v. TraversCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API