Legal Opinion

People v. King

California Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 2006No. S129052PublishedCited by 80 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KENNARD, J.

Subdivision (a)(1) of Penal Code section 12020 (section 12020(a)(1)), 1 prohibits the possession of a variety of weapons. Does it require a culpable mental state, or is it a “public welfare offense,” for which proof of a culpable mental state is not required? We conclude that section 12020(a)(1) is not a public welfare offense, and that the prosecution must prove the possessor’s knowledge of the weapon’s illegal characteristics.

We also conclude that when, as here, the prohibited weapon is a “short-barreled rifle”—in this case a rifle that had been altered to reduce its…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Staples v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. People v. VogelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  3. People v. GrubbCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  4. In Re JenningsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  5. People v. RubalcavaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by80 opinions

  1. Shirk v. Vista Unified School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Miklosy v. Regents of the University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
  3. People v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Committee for Green Foothills v. Santa Clara County Bd. of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
  5. People v. CornettCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012

75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API