Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Boyd v. Huntington

California Supreme Court

Decided May 13, 1932No. Docket No. S.F. 14463PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

This is a proceeding in mandamus to compel the payment to petitioner by respondent, Director of the Department of Professional and Vocational Standards, of the sum of $300 alleged to be due him as secretary of the board of dental examiners for the month of September, 1931.

It appears from the record that petitioner was appointed a member of the board by the Governor of the state November 9, 1927, his commission stating he was appointed for the term prescribed by law, vice E. J. Wylie, term expired. He qualified as such member and was thereafter elected secretary of the board December…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People, Ex Rel. Mason v. . McClaveNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
  2. People ex rel. Aylett v. LangdonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1857
  3. Bruce v. MatlockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1908
  4. People v. NickelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Stafford v. Realty Bond Service Corp.California Supreme Court · 1952
  2. In Re MarquezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Medical Board v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  4. Anderson v. PhillipsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Barber v. BlueCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API