May v. Tidewater Power Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtWinborne, J.
Careful consideration of the allegations in the complaint lead to the conclusion that the demurrer should be sustained.
If we consider this an action in tort for wrongful discharge, which we think it is, the liability must grow out of the violation of some legal duty by the defendant, not arising out of contract, and “the complaint should state facts sufficient to show such legal duty and its violation resulting in injury to plaintiff.” McIntosh P. & P., 394.
“A wrongful discharge from employment becomes the basis of an action in tort when accompanied by a wrongful act which amounts to a…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Ballinger v. . ThomasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
- Insurance Co. v. . McCrawSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
- State v. BellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
- Richardson v. Wilmington & Weldon RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1900
- Edwards v. Seaboard & Roanoke RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Hogan v. Forsyth Country Club Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
- Sides v. Duke UniversityCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- Still v. LanceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- Howell v. Commercial Credit Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- Scott v. BURLINGTON MILLS CORPORATIONSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.