Southworth v. City of Seattle
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam:.
This is an action by Roy B. South-worth and his wife against the city of Seattle, to re cover for damages to their residence property by reason of the construction and operation, Immediately near their property, of a sewage disposal plant. There was a verdict for the plaintiffs in the sum of $3,250, more than one-third of the value of the property without the nuisance, and from a judgment on the verdict, the city has appealed.
As stated by appellant in its opening brief,
“The action is laid under § 16, art. 1 of the constitution, for the damaging of respondents’ property, by the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Wong Kee Jun v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1927
- Everett v. PaschallWashington Supreme Court · 1910
- Jacobs v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1918
- Jacobs v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1916
- Goodrich v. StarrettWashington Supreme Court · 1919
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Boitano v. Snohomish CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1941
- Dickgieser v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- Cunningham v. Town of TietonWashington Supreme Court · 1962
- Dickgieser v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- Snavely v. City of GoldendaleWashington Supreme Court · 1941
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.