Everett v. Paschall
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Gilliam, J., entered April 25, 1910, upon findings in favor of the defendant, dismissing on the merits an action to enjoin the maintenance of a nuisance.
1Opinion of the CourtChadwick, J.
The findings of the trial judge show that plaintiffs are the owners of, and reside upon, lot 14, block 19, Madison Park addition to the city of Seattle, in King county; that their property is of the value of $2,000. Defendant is the owner of the south half of lots 12 and 13, block 9, upon which a cottage is situated. An alleyway separates plaintiffs’ lot from the fractional lots of the defendant. On November 29, 1909, defendant opened, and has since maintained in his cottage, a private sanitarium for the treatment and care of persons afflicted with tuberculosis. The sanitarium has a capacity…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Mayor of Baltimore v. Fairfield Improvement Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1898
- Stotler v. RochelleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1910
- Shepard v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1910
- Barnes v. HathornSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1866
- Cherry v. . WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Lakey v. Puget Sound Energy, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2013
- Densmore v. Evergreen Camp No. 147Washington Supreme Court · 1910
- Brown v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Bragg v. IvesCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1927
- Goodrich v. StarrettWashington Supreme Court · 1919
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.