Legal Opinion

Benbow v. EDMUNDS HIGH SCHOOL

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided November 15, 1951No. 16564PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OxnEr, Justice.

This is an appeal from an order of the Court below affirming a finding of the Industrial Commission that appellant, D. J. Benbow, was not entitled to recover benefits under the Workmen’s Compensation Act for injuries received by him while doing certain repair work at the Edmunds High-School, in the City of Sumter. The claim for compensation was denied upon the grounds (1) that the employment was casual, and (2) that the work in which appellant was engaged at the time of his injury was not a part of the “trade,, business, or occupation” of said school.

The facts are undisputed…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Asheville Hosiery Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  2. Marchbanks v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1939
  3. Boseman v. Pacific MillsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1940
  4. Board of Supervisors v. BoazSupreme Court of Virginia · 1940
  5. Yeomans v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1941

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Adams v. Davison-Paxon Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1957
  2. DeBerry v. Coker Freight LinesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1959
  3. Parker v. Williams and Madjanik, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1980
  4. Blue Ridge Rural Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. James Earl ByrdCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1956
  5. Bell v. South Carolina Electric & Gas Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1959

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API